|
 I put Petro Vital on my car. I have Opel Movano minibus which I ride on much. I felt the real positive results from it at once. I have already economized near 10 litres of fuel after my passage about 600 km l. I have one weakness: I am a rapid ride lover. A positive effect is felt even on speed, because bus becomes a bit more powerful, and speed is increased.Therefore,I will think to put this device on Mersedes in a prospect too.
Alex Kirovograd  My friend advised me to purchase Petro Vital one and a half years ago. And I thought, if the new opening allowed me to save 10% of fuel surely, 10% of my money, why not to make attempt? Boys set the device on my car at the station (Chevrolet Lacetti) –I have gas setting. It allowed me to save one and a half litres on 100 km. And I economized about six hundred dollars for this year.
Dmitry Kirovograd  I tried on an economizer. The thing is very good. It is appeared that it saves on my car (I have a machine named Opel Vectra, volume of engine is 3,2 l, that’s the advanced machine) somewhere 12%-15% fuels. It was tested exactly on my machine.
Paul Kirovograd  Car Shkoda-Fabiya elegans. Year of issue is 2006. Beginning of exploitation of device is 17.06.2009g. Volume of engine is 1.4l (V-1397dm3).Run of car in the moment of setting of «Petro-vital» is 94600km. Middle (city-route) expense of fuel in the moment of setting of "PV"is 7.3l/100 km. Out-of-town expense before setting is 5.5 - 5.7l/100km.
After setting of «PV» the middle expense of fuel was 6.5 l./100 km from 0 to 1300 km. It grew in subsequent to 6.7 l./km. After a run of 3500 km middle expense was 6.6 l/km. Now the computer displays 4.5 l/100 km in the out-of-town mode. The reference expense of fuel (middle) was hardly more than 8%. And at an out-of-town cycle and speed of 80-90km p/h .economy was about 20%. (All figures are resulted on the built-in computer of car)  I purchased "PV" on May, 6 and set it on the "Niva",my official machine was in use 2 years. A volume of engine is 1,7 litre.
The car is of domestic producer.before setting It took a 12-13 l/100 km before setting, and with the turned on bridges and blocking up to 14 l/100km. Nowdays,(and almost three months passed already), after setting of "PV" the consumption of fuel is 9 l/100 km in the mixed mode of exploitation, it is from 18% to 30% of economy.Besides,the technical state of engine became better. We began rarer to purge fuel system, carburetter area, electric lighting. Candles cleared up from nakers. If I passed 20-30 thousands of kilometres on these candles before, whereupon they need to be thrown out, now I do not see such necessity. Quality of engine working became better, an engine works steadier. Seeing positive results on the "Niva", we set "PV" on MAZ at the beginning of June. A machine is 5 years.The engine is of D-245 with turbodiezel, Byelorussian fuel apparatus. Volume of engine is 4,5 l. If to setting of "PV" a consumption of fuel on a 100 km was 17-19 l., today on the average is 15-16 l. Now we purchased 2 PV" on KAMAZ trailer with a saddle semitrailer. Now we look after results. Kirovograd of "Agrokhim" Pegeot Exper 230l. Beginning of eksploitation of device is on 22.06.2009. Volume of an engine is 2000. Run of car in the moment of setting of «PV» is 308000 km. A middle expense of fuel before setting was 6 - 6,5l. The first time after setting when cleaning from nakers passed traction disappeared. At short notice (for these 2 months after setting a run was about 4000km ), a thruster-on was put right, a machine worked without failures. In the out-of-town mode an expense is 5 l. on a 100 km We use a device 4 months, put it on one of our machines: ZIL -130,a kind of fuel is gas propan. First two hundreds of kilometres obvious changes were not observed, but literally in a few days, and the machine passed on the average 6000 km/ month the effect of economy,that was already observed till today, became visible: 2,5 -4 litre on a 100 km, that is 8-10% . A device was covered a cost practically for 2 months. We are content with the new indexes of expense of fuel, and recommend to set a device to others. PF «Campos K» Kirovograd 20.07.2009 I purchased a device on one simple reason - I like to economize money, save them. Therefore I became interested in this possibility. As well as many other people, I a bit skeptically behave to the similar things, therefore in the beginning I purchased one device (hardly more then half year ago), but when I tested it on the bus (a minibus Mersedes Sprinter), I understood that it is an interesting thing, because on the most initial stage (in the first month after setting) it helped me to economize at least 10% of fuel, therefore I purchased the second device and set it on the car Micubisi Padzhero. I save minimum 15% of fuel now. And because I ride very much, it turns out a good sum. An engine began to work a bit more soft, more even. 24.01.2009 I set a device on Shkoda Fabia. Volume of engine is 1.2l. A type of fuel is AI - 92 petrol . Middle expense before setting is 7.5 l/ km I didn’t notice any changes first 700 km after setting .After it over fired began . 1.5 months passed, for this time a run was about 4 000 km Now I am looking after such results.There are ( 100-110km per hour ) 5.9 l/km on a route.There are 6.6 l/km on greater speed with the switched conditioner. A percent of economy was 12% - 21%. |
